The reports were shared at the World Health Assembly. 6-7 November 2014 – Close to 100 high level representatives from governments, civil society, and international organizations have gathered in Geneva for two days to reaffirm their commitment to accelerating progress towards women’s and children’s health in the lead up to and in the post-2015 era, and to discuss how to ensure that accountability remains at the centre of this agenda. Governments of Canada and Norway, is the methodology for the identification of children at risk one of a number of high- level meetings convened by various key partners in 2014, all part of a larger strategic process aimed at bringing together stakeholders in women’s and children’s health to keep the momentum going and set the agenda as we approach the MDGs.
MDGs 4 and 5, aimed at reducing child and maternal deaths and improving maternal health, are lagging behind. We should judge the progress in humanity and the progress of any society or country by the way they treat their women and children. They have been lagging behind in the last 20 to 30 years of development. We should give them special attention. Dr Flavia Bustreo about the need to further accelerate progress.
Country assessments and roadmaps for accountability for health. Assessments drafted during accountability workshops, based on the Country Accountability Framework assessment and planning tool, and roadmaps reviewed and validated through a broad consultation with the major stakeholders in-country. See that long list of ingredients on the back of the bottle? Some probably aren’t as safe as you’d hope. Stay informed by signing up to receive email tips, action alerts, promotions to support our work and more from EWG. You can opt-out at any time. About Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep It’s our mission at Environmental Working Group to use the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
EWG’s Skin Deep database gives you practical solutions to protect yourself and your family from everyday exposures to chemicals. We launched Skin Deep in 2004 to create online profiles for cosmetics and personal care products and their potential hazards and health concerns. Skin Deep Product and Ingredient Databases Below we describe the data sources and the methodology we use to construct Skin Deep’s linked databases of ingredients, products, brands, companies, hazards, testing availability, and regulatory status. Product Details The core of Skin Deep is an electronic product database that contains ingredients in 74,179 products. EWG obtained detailed information on these products from online retailers, manufacturers, product packaging, and, to a lesser extent, through other methods described below. In order for Skin Deep users to easily find the most current products on the market, EWG will mark any products that have been in the database for longer than 3 years as “old formulation. Products that have not been verified in the last 6 years will be removed from the database.
This will ensure that the most up-to-date products show up first on when consumers search the database. Value-Added Product Information Every product added to Skin Deep is carefully reviewed by EWG staff to identify product type, product use and composition, target demographic, and special product claims. EWG records information on how each product is typically used. For instance, chemicals that are hazardous when they are inhaled would be a concern for products that are sprayed or that are in powder form. Body areas exposed: skin, face, lips, around the eyes, hair or scalp, in the mouth, on damaged or cracked skin, on nails or cuticles, or on areas for feminine hygiene. Type of exposure: product left on after application, rinsed off, or wiped off. Form of the product: solid, cream, liquid, gel, mousse, packed powder, loose powder, spray, aerosol.
Special product claims: For some product types EWG compiles information about claims made by manufacturers. For example, with each sunscreen product we store SPF claims, water resistance, and other sun protection claims. Brand and company information: Skin Deep currently holds products sold under 2,145 brand names and manufactured by 1,610 companies. Skin Deep contains a brand and company database created by EWG researchers, built primarily through online research into each brand contained in Skin Deep. Because animal testing is an issue of concern for many consumers, we also incorporate into Skin Deep information on company and brand stances on animal testing. We periodically update our Skin Deep database to reflect the most current PETA and Leaping Bunny listings. Ingredients in Skin Deep’s database Skin Deep currently contains information on 8,982 personal care product ingredients, culled from ingredient labels on products and from the scientific and industry literature on personal care products.